雅思A类写作教材推荐这7本书给你 篇一
练习的首选材料依然是真题。
剑桥系列后面附有考官的范文，很值得研究。其他反响较好的练习材料有：
1、《十天突破雅思写作》
这本书的江湖地位不用多说。基本一提到雅思写作，就必会有人推荐此书，简直就是《圣经》一般的地位。客观的讲，书籍能够风靡，自然有一定的道理。这本书算得上是很实用基础的辅导教材，里面的内容包括雅思写作技巧、常见的错误、亮点的词汇和句型。值得好好研究。但是不要生硬地照搬，否则画虎不成反类犬。
2、《雅思8分万能作文》
这书经常拿来和十天相提并论，是考官所写的书。里面收录了考官所写的范文。可以借鉴。
3、《雅思写作套路剖析与范例大全》
这书比较厚，讲的也很细，从语法到句子再到范文，和十天一个套路的。可以看看，多借鉴一些写作思路总没有坏处。
4、朗文出版，《Writing Academic English》
这不是专门为雅思考试量身定做的，但也许是雅思写作最给力的书籍。因为雅思写作的大作文，考的就是学术写作。书籍适合雅思考试想考高分的人（6.5-7分），因为是全方位的讲解，里面对结构、逻辑、上下文衔接的问题解释的很清楚，适合基础不错力求高分的人。毕竟是英文原版书籍，看起来多少有些吃力。但如果能啃完，嘿嘿，会受益匪浅的。
同为英文原版书籍，Macmillan出了本《Improve Your IELTS Writing Skills 》，专门针对雅思考试的。书籍没有上面那本的口碑好，有时间的话，可以翻一翻，对照着做参考。
5、语法书。
语法书列在这里可能有些突兀，其实不然。雅思里面没有直接的语法考题，但是其实处处涉及语法。语法不好，阅读长难句一定会觉得吃力，而最直接的表现就会是在写作里。语法是语言的章法，不过关的话，写出的句子是对是错都无法判断，甚至无法让人读懂。此书适合语法不好、写作功底薄弱的人，不要过分的好高骛远，写作功底是一点一滴的积累起来的。
剑桥官方出了本《剑桥雅思语法》，针对雅思的语法练习，再合适不过了：
《百变语法》，也比较有名：
6、《剑桥图表》和《品读剑桥》PDF文件。
这是互联网上的牛人原创的作品。对剑桥系列后面的范文的点评和总结，适合作为真题写作的辅助材料。一个人的思维总是有局限的，阅读他人的作品，就是了解他人的思路，最终让自己受益。
常见的写作材料是以上几种。辅导书是辅助用的，关键还是要考自己多练习。Practice makes perfect。
按目标分数选雅思写作备考书
写作（目标分数：5.5分）：
7、《十天突破雅思写作》
对于基础并不好的5.5分党这本书的词汇是短期能提分的，但对于出国读研的同学，这本书目前是真心不够的。对了，此书要配合雅思写作老师使用，如果自己不写作文的话，那这书其实也不用看，直接考兴许5.5
以上就是雅思A类写作教材推荐这7本书给你的全部内容，在看这些雅思写作教材的时候，我们应该怎么看呢？一个是要注意其中的好词好句，也就是可以复用的单词和句型，以及表达方式。一个是注意范文的架构和写作思路，学习好的范文的架构和写作思路能够让我们的文章更清晰，更一目了然。
雅思大作文：it is irrational to forbid the animal products 篇二
雅思大作文题目：In modern world, it is no longer necessary to use animals for food or use animal products, for instance, clothing and medicines. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your ownknowledge or experience.
作文范文：
With the advance of the technology, a colossal number of animal products can be replaced by artificial or synthetic elements in the modern society. As a result, many people claim that there is no longer necessary to consume animals to produce any food, clothing, and medicines. But I personally believe such opinion is invalid.
At no circumstance, can the animal products be replaced. First of all, human body cannot depart from meat, since our muscles is built by absorbing the protein coming from meat. And a huge number of necessary nutrition which is crucial to maintain our whole physical system also come animal food products. Thus, without meat, there would be negative effects on our health. In addition, abandoning all the animal products will definitely curb the augment of the economy. More specifically, ifthe market does not consume the animal products any more, animal husbandry would be totally destroyed, generating the unemployment of hundreds of thousands of farmers, then relatively, social instability would appear and the economy would collapse. Clearly, it is irrational to forbid the animal products.
However, some people argue that human beings have the obligation to stop use any animal products as the technology has way developed than before so that the substitution of animal products can be easily found. Unfortunately, such advocate fail to recognize the reality that many animal products, especially some medicines, cannot be replaced. Furthermore, these people do not distinguish the concept between animal preservation and animal products consumption. In other words, to abandon the animal products is not the best way to protect the animal.
In conclusion, it is to early to abandon all the animal products, regardless of the valid alternatives resulting from the advance of the technology. And accordingly, the averages should understand that rejecting any animal products dose not stand for the animal protection.
雅思大作文：it is necessary to teach children the skill of handwriting 篇三
雅思大作文题目：In modern age, some people think it is unnecessary to teach children the skill of handwriting, to what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
作文范文：
With the advent of the typewriter, more and more text works has been done by Keyboard or even vocal input. Therefore, there is a claim that children nowadays need not to exert their great efforts in learning how to write.
At the first glare, this point of view has its own ground. Compared with handwriting, first of all, It is both efficient and fashionable to write something by typing with a keyboard orrelying on vocal interpretation-imagine the scenario in which a columnist is doing his or her writing with a laptop in the cafe. As well as that, modern input techniques can be regarded as terrific tools as it does not interrupt the writer's stream of thought if being very skillful in utilizing them.
However, it should be recognized that learning through writing has decided advantages. The greatest one is that handwriting facilitates knowledge acquisition, especially for the children. While they are taking notes by hand, this heavier and less efficient labor actually requires the coordination among their brains, hands and eyes, but the reward is a long lasting memory and better understanding. Pencraft, if any children would achieve, has a more profound importance as it could be regarded as a kind of art and even a cultural identity. This would help the children in the long run make money out of this and preserve this precious cultural heritage.
In conclusion, I almost disagree with the statement. This does not mean the typewriting is worse than pen and ink, but for the sake of education, this sort of training is very fundamental and no nation can afford the consequences.